Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48

Thread: The "Challenge"

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,952
    Blog Entries
    1


    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    He must have hired a new person midseason because he used to be very good at when and when not to challenge.

    It's been really, really bad the last couple weeks.
    Maybe they are letting Cam do it )
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  2. #17

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Yeah, I was getting to that section, but stumbled upon this confusing part of the rulebook (that looks to be specifically overruled by the part you mentioned):

    Section 2. Dead Ball
    Article 1: Dead Ball Declared


    ....

    (n) when an official sounds his whistle while the ball is still in play, the ball becomes dead immediately;
    (i) If the ball is in player possession, the team in possession may elect to put the ball in play where it
    has been declared dead or to replay the down.
    (ii) If the ball is a loose ball resulting from a fumble, backward pass, or illegal forward pass, the team
    last in possession may elect to put the ball in play at the spot where possession was lost or to
    replay the down.




  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Wilmington, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,297
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    Frankly, I think he didn't understand that the play wouldn't have continued after Upshaw's recovery...that he thought it may have been a fumble, but feared that if the ref's changed it to a fumble, they would have given the ball back to New York because of Upshaw's fumble.
    After the called back JJ TD, and the bizarre calls and explanations in the game, I would not have trusted the refs to make the right call whether they reviewed it or not. When the refs told Coughlin the challenge would do him no good, and we knew it was 4th down, the thing to do was leave well enough alone. Giants couldn't challenge, and knowing the Giants had to punt.

    If we had challenged, I am not at all sure the idiot in the replay booth would have done the right thing.

    I think the thought process was, "Screw it, let's just take the punt and not give these morons in the booth another chance to **** us with a replay review. They're liable to give the Giants the damn ball. Screw it."




  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,952
    Blog Entries
    1
    But they didn't blow the whistle, they let it play out. I may be missing the point here
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  5. #20

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    Once they ruled that it was an incomplete pass, the play would have stopped at the spot of the clear recovery of Upshaw.

    I thought it was a horrible "non challenge" by Harbaugh...particularly after his horrible thinking process over the last couple weeks with challenging.

    Frankly, I think he didn't understand that the play wouldn't have continued after Upshaw's recovery...that he thought it may have been a fumble, but feared that if the ref's changed it to a fumble, they would have given the ball back to New York because of Upshaw's fumble.

    It was a bad no challenge.
    Thats what happened, he didn't know what to do basically. But he knew he would get the ball back and didnt want to jeopardize losing the ball somehow. Football coaches and officials are far from geniuses. Why isnt UpStupid just falling on the football instead of trying to run with it?




  6. #21

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Haloti92 View Post
    Yeah, I was getting to that section, but stumbled upon this confusing part of the rulebook (that looks to be specifically overruled by the part you mentioned):

    Section 2. Dead Ball
    Article 1: Dead Ball Declared


    ....

    (n) when an official sounds his whistle while the ball is still in play, the ball becomes dead immediately;
    (i) If the ball is in player possession, the team in possession may elect to put the ball in play where it
    has been declared dead or to replay the down.
    (ii) If the ball is a loose ball resulting from a fumble, backward pass, or illegal forward pass, the team
    last in possession may elect to put the ball in play at the spot where possession was lost or to
    replay the down.
    Yea, I saw that too, but I was sure I'd heard this specific case mentioned when they originally discussed changing the rule.

    Also, I've found a link for the 2012 Rulebook, in case anyone is interested:

    http://www.blogandtackle.net/wp-cont...FLRuleBook.pdf

    They've modified that section to include backward passes, but otherwise it's the same.




  7. #22

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    But they didn't blow the whistle, they let it play out. I may be missing the point here
    I think they blew it and signaled incomplete, then sort of let it play out (didn't keep blowing their whistles). I need to watch the replay again, but I remember thinking "how can they call that incomplete" as the play was still going on. I also remember they started blowing their whistles repeatedly before the final recovery (by the Giants) was finished or sorted out.

    It was a weird play. And one I think Harbaugh should have challenged, but it only cost us field position as we were going to get the ball back on a punt anyway.




  8. #23

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    Once they ruled that it was an incomplete pass, the play would have stopped at the spot of the clear recovery of Upshaw.

    I thought it was a horrible "non challenge" by Harbaugh...particularly after his horrible thinking process over the last couple weeks with challenging.

    Frankly, I think he didn't understand that the play wouldn't have continued after Upshaw's recovery...that he thought it may have been a fumble, but feared that if the ref's changed it to a fumble, they would have given the ball back to New York because of Upshaw's fumble.

    It was a bad no challenge.
    That was exactly my thinking -- that Harbaugh simply did not understand the rules as they applied to that play, and he thought the ball might be given to the Giants. But even so, it would have been 5 yards behind where they ended up spotting it anyway, and he wouldn't have lost the challenge because it was clearly a fumble, not an incomplete pass. The whole thing was a mess, to say the least. But it was another example of Harbaugh's confusion on the sideline when a decisive informed call needed to be made by him.




  9. #24

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by NC Raven View Post
    After the called back JJ TD, and the bizarre calls and explanations in the game, I would not have trusted the refs to make the right call whether they reviewed it or not. When the refs told Coughlin the challenge would do him no good, and we knew it was 4th down, the thing to do was leave well enough alone. Giants couldn't challenge, and knowing the Giants had to punt.

    If we had challenged, I am not at all sure the idiot in the replay booth would have done the right thing.

    I think the thought process was, "Screw it, let's just take the punt and not give these morons in the booth another chance to **** us with a replay review. They're liable to give the Giants the damn ball. Screw it."
    All they would lose is a time out...if we got that call, we likely would have put the game away a lot earlier.

    As to your last point...after the refs said "the replay would not benefit the Giants at all"...they just told the world that at worst if we threw the flag, we'd lose a time out late in the first half (I think it was the first half).
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  10. #25

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    All they would lose is a time out...if we got that call, we likely would have put the game away a lot earlier.

    As to your last point...after the refs said "the replay would not benefit the Giants at all"...they just told the world that at worst if we threw the flag, we'd lose a time out late in the first half (I think it was the first half).
    Well, there's more to it than just losing the timeout. We had already challenged once (successfully). If we challenged again and lost, we'd be out of challenges for the rest of the game. Considering it was still the 1st half, and the game was still close, that's pretty significant.

    In retrospect, it seems obvious to challenge. At the time though, you're weighing the following possibilities:

    - ruling goes in your favor: get the turnover, have the ball in Giants territory,
    - ruling goes against you (1): the pass is ruled incomplete, you gain nothing and lose the ability to challenge a call for the rest of the game
    - ruling goes against you (2): the play is ruled a fumble, BUT the refs decide the play was never stopped (this may actually be true: I rewatched the play, and on TV, you never hear a whistle blow, or see a ref wave his arms). the head ref then holds that the play continued without interruption, and both fumbles count, giving the ball back to the Giants.

    3rd outcome may be a long-shot, but impossible? Not if you've been watching the same games I have all these years

    Given that there's a lot that can possibly go wrong, and you're GUARANTEED to get the ball if you do nothing, a punt starts to look like a pretty good option.

    Especially when you have about 20 seconds to decide, and no replay to look at before deciding.




  11. Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkS View Post
    Well, there's more to it than just losing the timeout. We had already challenged once (successfully). If we challenged again and lost, we'd be out of challenges for the rest of the game. Considering it was still the 1st half, and the game was still close, that's pretty significant.

    In retrospect, it seems obvious to challenge. At the time though, you're weighing the following possibilities:

    - ruling goes in your favor: get the turnover, have the ball in Giants territory,
    - ruling goes against you (1): the pass is ruled incomplete, you gain nothing and lose the ability to challenge a call for the rest of the game
    - ruling goes against you (2): the play is ruled a fumble, BUT the refs decide the play was never stopped (this may actually be true: I rewatched the play, and on TV, you never hear a whistle blow, or see a ref wave his arms). the head ref then holds that the play continued without interruption, and both fumbles count, giving the ball back to the Giants.

    3rd outcome may be a long-shot, but impossible? Not if you've been watching the same games I have all these years

    Given that there's a lot that can possibly go wrong, and you're GUARANTEED to get the ball if you do nothing, a punt starts to look like a pretty good option.

    Especially when you have about 20 seconds to decide, and no replay to look at before deciding.
    Which was the first challenge? The Jones non-fumble was called by the booth as it has to be on turnovers.




  12. #27

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Harbs was talking to the officials during that whole clusterfuck, and who knows what they might have told him which may have convinced him that challenging wasn't worth the risk.

    These officials were absolutely horrendous--cost us 10+ points/kept the Giants in the game with their BS calls.




  13. #28

    Re: The "Challenge"

    the refs said there was no advantage for the giants to challenge because they said Eli's pass was incomplete but if it were a fumble they ruled that the giants recovered it so i dont think Harbs had anything to challenge




  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Posts
    2,812

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Brtnder81 View Post
    the refs said there was no advantage for the giants to challenge because they said Eli's pass was incomplete but if it were a fumble they ruled that the giants recovered it so i dont think Harbs had anything to challenge
    the giants where challenging the incomplete pass, coughlin wanted them to rule it a fumble because once the giants recovered upshaw fumble it would be 1st and 10 for them. The refs said their is no advantage to the giants because they blew the play dead and so their was no clear fumble recovery by the giants, meaning the last clear possession was upshaw recovering the fumble. Ie no advantage to the giants from challenging, ie there is advantage to the ravens. Yet he still didnt challenge.




  15. #30

    Re: The "Challenge"

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    I think he relies on someone upstairs to tell him when to challenge.
    He always does with his 'eye-in-the-sky', and that there is the problem! I think it's the same coach up there for the last 5 years.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland