They broke down how the libertarian vote spread went. It went equally. Take them out, cuccinelli still loses...
Voting based on social issues will be the death of this country.
Liberal view: Take everybody's money as long as you take their guns too.
Republican view: Make sound fiscal decisions but take a hard line on opposing religious view points.
Fiscally I'm even further on the right than Trap. I consider anyone who votes democrat to be little more than a thief unwilling to risk an ass-whooping by stealing my money themselves. On social issues I'm towards the middle, particularly with gay rights. Since I don't think government should be telling folks how to spend their money or live their lives, I vote for smaller government.
I might even be a bit more socially liberal, as long as you don't consider gun-rights a social issue, which I DO NOT.
I truly and honestly believe that was this country needs is a swift kick in the pants from liberatarian values.
The more we (as a populace) keep getting fooled by the sleight of hand caused by abortion and gay marriage discussion, the more we will see that the other hand is literally stealing money from our wallets.
those people voted on social values then disappeared in the general election.
Santorum got all those votes on social issues and almost out-lasted Mitt who had
more money. There's that word again.
And speaking of all those presidents getting shot for messing with the bank, Paul
would be the next one shot if he were ever elected president if he agrees with his
dad and he probably does who said this.
“The greatest threat facing America today is not terrorism or illegal immigration. The greatest threat is the shameless deficit spending of our government and Federal Reserve currency devaluation. The Press sometimes criticizes Federal Reserve policy but the validity of the fiat system itself is never challenged. History shows that when the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, the political structure becomes unstable. We then have good reason to be concerned about the future of our nation.” —
Christie is being pimped by the media like McCain and Romney were. Moderate "healers" and all of that crap. Reagan worked fine with the Democrats in Congress and he was more conservative than any of these three.
Besides, this is the MSM we're talking about. They're going to shape the message, not a potential candidate in the Dem primary.
She is most likely going to un unopposed anyway. But if not, the candidate won't be taken seriously by the media, thus Benghazi won't be an issue.
I will be surprised if Hillary has no competition. And if somebody wants the job they will use whatever they can. If not and she is the nominee the Republican should most certainly use it. They should also be starting NOW to lash her to Obamacare. I don't know how much it is like her idea from the 90s but it is close. I would begin painting her with that brush now.
Reagan was one of the most liberal presidents since FDR. After granting big tax breaks, he took 1/3 of it back by raising taxes 4 times in his first term with much pressure from his WH staff. Then he raised taxes about 7 or 8 times in his second term. That's why Bush said read my lips, no new taxes. Of course he raised them too and it cost him the election. Conservatives didn't give him the pass they gave Reagan.
When 60 MIns brought this up to Cantor the big rising star of the conservatives his man yelled from off camera that's not true on the air. Darlene Stahl played tapes of Reagan saying he had to compromise and raise taxes. Played 4 different tapes. Cantor didn't even know it.
Then, after campaigning to streamline the federal gov't he created the biggest monster since IRS called the Protection Plunge Plan or PPP. This plan is so secret that most experts on Wall Street don't know about it including my broker when I asked him.
We had a bank manager coming in here who knew about it and all about derivatives and he wanted to know how I knew. I read John Crudele.
The purpose of the PPP was to prevent another Black Monday of the 80s when the markets crashed. Someone in the GOP who lost a lot of money, probably Mease who put Reagan in and became the Atty General, forced Reagan to create so he wouldn't lose any more money. Someone big forced him to do it.
The PPP got more dangerous as Clinton expanded it even greater as it sets the markets price as the recent Chairman of Sachs who was Clinton's financial czar operated it during Ws term since he was experienced with it. He was ahead of Goldman Sachs which collapsed after Lehman Bros that caused the crash and they got all that TARP money. He knows how the market is going as he sets and determines the shorts and derivatives and makes a nice profit on the side for him and his cronies.
It was working great until the crash of 08 when I lost a lot of money.
Four men control Wall Street and nobody knows about it.
Try calling the PPP and see if you get through to their office. John
Crudele tried and couldn't get thru.
This fraternity comprises of Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the heads of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Association. It works closely with all the U.S. exchanges and Wall Street banks, including the largest DERIVATIVE risk holders Citibank and JP Morgan Chase.
Few people are aware of Executive Order 12631 signed by Ronald Reagan on March 18, 1988. In a nut shell, this is the "authority" behind the four dictators and the [sic] "laws" and "regulations" that have backed their casino-style DERIVATIVE gambling spree since 2001. Here are some highlights of this Executive Order to ponder: