Buddy of mine is a huge Cowboys fan. First thing he said to me when I saw him Monday was, "You know how to say Tony Romo in Spanish? Mark Sanchez."
Every game Romo is a mistake waiting to happen.
The Cowboys would have made the play offs a lot more under Flacco since 08 than they have done under Romo, that's for sure.
Oh, and it should come as no surprise that the OP posts this and then nothing else...
Tony Romo is better than Flacco? Here is my response in gif form.
completely different systems, completely different plans on how to win. that said, as strictly a QB across systems, Flacco, imo. Hes run just about the least QB/WR friendly system the past 5 years and still has come through in the clutch and put up some great games, although inconsistently. Thats without Witten, Austin and Bryant either. He can make more throws because of his arm and see the feild better because of his height. As much grief as people give him for being a INT/TO machine, hes actually one of the better in the league at actually not turning it over (only 4 qbs have less INTs with more than 400 and thats including RG3 whos at 393). Romo on the other hand... Im not sure how people can call it close besides they both have TOs at inopportune times, but flacco getting sack stripped is a little different than romo flat out throwing it to the other team. That should carry a little more weight i would think.
The only thing Romo is better at (IMO) is extending plays, doesn't mean they won't result in a game ending INT, but he does extend plays much better than Joe.
don't think I've ever heard him called our boy Pretty Flacco.