Originally Posted by
callahan09
If the Clintons really employed a cadre of assassins with a trail of bodies in their wake, don't you think they'd have done a better job of making this look like a routine mugging gone wrong instead of whatever it is that's being speculated it looks like? Wouldn't they be... I dunno a little smarter and better at it than to create optics that look questionable as you are suggesting?
The guy was killed at 4am in a bad neighborhood. It doesn't take that big of a leap to think it was just a random act of violence, but it takes a huge leap to attribute it to a string of assassinations carried out at the behest of the Clintons.
If the Clintons like to kill people so much, what's with the huge amount of adversaries who have been left to live? I can create a crazy conspiracy theory around this to, by the way: maybe the Russians had the guy killed in a suspicious way and planted all the seeds that he was the leaker rather than the Russians, to try to make it look like the Clintons had him killed? After all, our intelligence community is in agreement that the Russians hacked the DNC/Podesta, not that it was Seth Rich blowing whistles from the inside, and why would our intelligence agencies lie about that to protect the Clintons, especially now?
My proposal has about as much reason and evidence behind it as yours (which ain't much... I think the simplest explanation is probably the truest: it was a random act of unfortunate violence).