Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
I would love to breakdown the rookie class. Grubbs, Yanda,Figurs, Barnes, etc... That would be great! Not to mention useful. Justin Bannan is a short timer here, the new rookie class is full of potential!
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Raven Nurse
I would love to breakdown the rookie class. Grubbs, Yanda,Figurs, Barnes, etc... That would be great! Not to mention useful. Justin Bannan is a short timer here, the new rookie class is full of potential!
:insane: Justin Bannan is a DT. The "new rookie class" doesn't consist of any DTs; and not to mention, we also lost one to Free Agency. Not sure why you think Justin Bannan is a short timer here, when there's really no one to take his job.
Not that I'm complaining. I really liked what i saw from Bannan last season (as a rotational lineman) & would love to see him stick around a few more years.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lance1086
:insane:
Not that I'm complaining. I really liked what i saw from Bannan last season (as a rotational lineman) & would love to see him stick around a few more years.
That's precisely why this post came about. Dozens of us held this opinion, which is clearly debated by the stats with him on the field. His presence statistically hirt the team last year. I'd welcome the opportunity to review a couple of these games, but I no longer have any on my DVR... I may have been simply rooting for the effort. In the long run thogh, that may turn him into our next Kelly Gregg.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jonboy79
That's precisely why this post came about. Dozens of us held this opinion, which is clearly debated by the stats with him on the field. His presence statistically hirt the team last year. I'd welcome the opportunity to review a couple of these games, but I no longer have any on my DVR... I may have been simply rooting for the effort. In the long run thogh, that may turn him into our next Kelly Gregg.
I watched the Tampa game last night. And still thought he looked fine. He was solid against the run, in taking on his man. And got a decent push on passes. Also, he had an effect on the 3rd INT, by getting a very good push right into Simms causing the bad pass. He isn't in our top 2 DTs, but I still believe that he was a good rotational lineman & will certainly not be cut.
I was gonna upload all the plays in which Bannan was in (against Tampa), but i got lazy. Maybe I'll do it later today.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lance1086
I
I was gonna upload all the plays in which Bannan was in (against Tampa), but i got lazy. Maybe I'll do it later today.
If you do, I'll throw a set of eyes on it in the next couple of days.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
The team was supposedly very happy with his play, so who am I to argue? :D
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Uploading the Tampa game is a great. I'll post the times of the plays he was in, but I have 2 things to say about it:
1. Statistically, Bannan had 2.9 YPPA while the team had 2.8, so he played at the same level as the team, something that was not representative of the season as a whole (Bannan 5.5, Team 4.5). That being said, we're doing this to see how people break down the action, not to prove a specific point about Bannan.
2. I personally want PBP analysis, not simply a general impression of what you saw (although that's cool if supported by good PBP analysis). He was only in for 16 defensive plays vs. Tampa, so that's not a huge assignment. It takes me about 45 minutes to both analyze the plays and take notes, then another 20 minutes to type it up.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Nice work Film....I really enjoy this stuff.
It might be interesting instead to compare Bannan's numbers to who 1) who he replaced and 2) who replaced him.
That will be an interesting indicator in terms of depth or some minor-supposed indicator of overall impact on the defense the change of a player might have.
Definitely interested in seeing a lot more...I really wish I had the time to do what you're doing. Really great stuff.
Thanks again for running through these stats :thumbup:
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lance1086
:insane: Justin Bannan is a DT. The "new rookie class" doesn't consist of any DTs; and not to mention, we also lost one to Free Agency. Not sure why you think Justin Bannan is a short timer here, when there's really no one to take his job.
Not that I'm complaining. I really liked what i saw from Bannan last season (as a rotational lineman) & would love to see him stick around a few more years.
Dude, no joke, really, a DT, really.....:insane: Was this debated somewhere. Gregg, NGATA have it wrapped up. As it has been reported, despite what one game you watched he is very replaceable and will only be here for a short while unless he gets better *which we all hope). My comments were to Filmstudy, to do this type of analysis on our rookie class, which will be very useful and interesting. :insane: :insane: :insane: Not sure where you are coming from. Read F.S's report, he really is pretty accurate.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
Bannan's plays vs. Tampa:
Q2 1/10 TB 32 14:36
Q2 2/8 TB 34 14:01
Q2 1/10 TB 37 8:52
Q2 2/2 TB 45 8:18
Q2 1/10 TB 50 7:39
Q2 2/6 Bal 46 6:55
Q3 1/10 Bal 12 7:20
Q3 2/11 Bal 13 6:43
Q3 3/4 Bal 6 5:50
Q3 4/4 Bal 6 5:45
Q3 1/10 TB 31 1:14
Q3 1/5 TB 25 0:39
Q3 2/2 TB 28 0:36
Q4 1/10 TB 31 15:00
Q4 1/10 TB 41 14:19
Q4 2/6 TB 45 13:38
I'll post notes after I review.
Re: Justin Bannan 9/24/06
These stats are pretty dry, but the conclusions are pure gold. Keep up the sterling work.