Printable View
:slaphead:
Two of my friends had a debate. One thinks that AP is clearly better than Foster, but the other thinks that because stats are even for this year, that they're close.
I think if AP was on the Texans, they would be the clear favorite. What do you guys think?
AP and it's not even close.
Arian Foster is a good player, but I'm not sure he'd have the success he's had with Houston somewhere else. The Shanahan WCO system is incredibly RB friendly and makes a lot of backs look like superstars, not to mention the talent that Houston have on the Oline. Hell a 6th round rookie is looking like an all pro in Washington this year, he looks like a good player, but no one seen that coming. It's no coincidence IMO, that nearly every back in that system has excelled no matter who it was. Arian has clearly done better than what the average back would, but he isn't on the level of AP. I honestly think AP could break serious records if he played for Houston. You know who else would probably have a shot at breaking records? Ray Rice.
AP is one of the top 4-5 RB's to ever play in the NFL.
Foster is one of the top 4-5 RB's in the NFL currently.
Peterson, and, as Leach said, it's not even close.
Peterson.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2