Exactly. If they are going to pick a QB it's going to be someone who can at least play in the offense
Printable View
If we didn't just pick up that dude from the Bears then I could see us spending one of the next couple picks on a QB, but I'd be shocked if they picked a QB that they don't need over a receiver or offensive lineman that we do need at this point.
Another linebacker at this point still fills depth needs that we are lacking right now with some of the questions still existing at that position.
The Jets are rumored to have serious interest in taking Matt Barkley and Tyler Bray with their next two picks. :slaphead:
Seriously, if the Ravens take a QB who might fit their system as a backup, they should look into Zac Dysert (Miami, Ohio) in the 6th or 7th round. I wouldn't think he lasts that long, but the way the draft is working out for QBs now, one never knows.
I'd be shocked if the pick him or any other QB unless its a late round or UDFA
Nope -- to Iggles
Well, count me in on the Quinton Patton train. We need a receiver, and he is the best one available.
I like Scott from Arizona in round 5 or 6
Jets still leading with 6 QB's to Eagles 5!
Apparently Ozzie didn't know it. Barkley is a great fit for what the Eagles want to do. I think he landed in about the best spot that he could have.
If we were going to draft a QB Landry Jones would have be the guy. The Steelers who run an offense reasonably close to ours felt the same way apparently.
This draft confirmed what I thought about Barkley another weak armed overrated sc qb
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk